goldenheartedrose:

johnwatsonswindmachine:

nethilia:

murdorito:

ankankimatank:

dollymacabre:

mszombi:

fleurdulys:

The Irritating Gentleman - Berthold Woltze
1874

I know that feel, Painting Lady. 

My bus ride to and from work every day.

They never published the second picture, which was the one where she backhanded him in the fucking face for getting all up in her shit.

Oh great, good to know this has been a problem for HUNDREDS OF YEARS CAN WE PLEASE STOP DOING THIS ALREADY JUST FUCK OFF AND LEAVE ME ALONE

Everyone is overlooking something very significant in this picture, that I saw in two seconds, that adds a layer of super slime to his whole awful attitude. “The Irritating Gentleman” is a politeness.
She’s wearing all black in 1874. Black gloves, hat, cloak, and dress. In public. The whole nine yards. That’s not a fashion choice or a gothic thing. Back then when people wore all black like that, they were in mourning for someone who died. No one did mourning like the Victorians, that shit was an art form to them.
Someone in her family has died—she could even be a young widow. No one’s accompanying her either. With the carpet bag? She’s traveling alone while still in deep mourning. Look at the closeup. She’s got tears in her eyes. She is upset, devastated in a way that one is only when someone has died. And the guy’s still bothering her, like her problems are flippant bullshit and she needs to just smile or pay attention to him because ladies are supposed to be pleasing for men no matter what shit they’re going through. That’s not a look of “what an ass.” That’s a look of devastation that even in her pain, she’s expected to give people like him focus. She’s not mad. She’s hurt. And to add insult to injury? Everyone would be able to tell. It was a clear sign and still is in ways that someone is mourning, to dress in black crepe like that. He would know why she’s wearing all black, and he’s still demanding her attention.
What an insufferable dick.
At least I’m not the only one who saw this.

I’m reblogging myself to add some comments from my mom. She’s a docent at the Portland Art Museum, and I wanted to see her take on this painting, given her art/art history knowledge. She said: 
“Just looking at it I’d say she’s recently lost her parent(s). She’s traveling alone and is waiting in a station that would be considered too “rough” for a lady in high standing. The crates around her, even the behavior of the man would indicate she’s in a rough part of town. Also, there’s a tear on her face, so not only is she grieving a loss, she’s grieving a loss of position and safety in the world.”

Reblogging for that comment right there.

Art history! It’s cool!

goldenheartedrose:

johnwatsonswindmachine:

nethilia:

murdorito:

ankankimatank:

dollymacabre:

mszombi:

fleurdulys:

The Irritating Gentleman - Berthold Woltze

1874

I know that feel, Painting Lady. 

My bus ride to and from work every day.

They never published the second picture, which was the one where she backhanded him in the fucking face for getting all up in her shit.

Oh great, good to know this has been a problem for HUNDREDS OF YEARS CAN WE PLEASE STOP DOING THIS ALREADY JUST FUCK OFF AND LEAVE ME ALONE

Everyone is overlooking something very significant in this picture, that I saw in two seconds, that adds a layer of super slime to his whole awful attitude. “The Irritating Gentleman” is a politeness.

She’s wearing all black in 1874. Black gloves, hat, cloak, and dress. In public. The whole nine yards. That’s not a fashion choice or a gothic thing. Back then when people wore all black like that, they were in mourning for someone who died. No one did mourning like the Victorians, that shit was an art form to them.

Someone in her family has died—she could even be a young widow. No one’s accompanying her either. With the carpet bag? She’s traveling alone while still in deep mourning. Look at the closeup. She’s got tears in her eyes. She is upset, devastated in a way that one is only when someone has died. And the guy’s still bothering her, like her problems are flippant bullshit and she needs to just smile or pay attention to him because ladies are supposed to be pleasing for men no matter what shit they’re going through. That’s not a look of “what an ass.” That’s a look of devastation that even in her pain, she’s expected to give people like him focus. She’s not mad. She’s hurt. And to add insult to injury? Everyone would be able to tell. It was a clear sign and still is in ways that someone is mourning, to dress in black crepe like that. He would know why she’s wearing all black, and he’s still demanding her attention.

What an insufferable dick.

At least I’m not the only one who saw this.

I’m reblogging myself to add some comments from my mom. She’s a docent at the Portland Art Museum, and I wanted to see her take on this painting, given her art/art history knowledge. She said: 

“Just looking at it I’d say she’s recently lost her parent(s). She’s traveling alone and is waiting in a station that would be considered too “rough” for a lady in high standing. The crates around her, even the behavior of the man would indicate she’s in a rough part of town. Also, there’s a tear on her face, so not only is she grieving a loss, she’s grieving a loss of position and safety in the world.”

Reblogging for that comment right there.

Art history! It’s cool!

(via fullofwhoa)

  1. tentaclue reblogged this from strider-sempai-noticed-you-and
  2. unknown-0-geek reblogged this from strider-sempai-noticed-you-and
  3. strider-sempai-noticed-you-and reblogged this from timmytiberiusturner
  4. yoyagug reblogged this from highvictoriana
  5. rolomcflurry reblogged this from magic-and-sword
  6. magic-and-sword reblogged this from fist-rockbone
  7. wholock-r-us reblogged this from messing-with-sass-quatch
  8. charlietheunicorn711 reblogged this from themaus
  9. scintillatingthoughts reblogged this from mgnxkiwi
  10. mgnxkiwi reblogged this from aussie-osbourne
  11. adlandia726 reblogged this from swiggityswrlthisismy1securl
  12. miasma15 reblogged this from iwillincendiotheheartoutofyou
  13. aussie-osbourne reblogged this from plsgirl
  14. baggitybagwhatsintheswag reblogged this from vio-skyo
  15. plsgirl reblogged this from theanimegirlaka
  16. vio-skyo reblogged this from theanimegirlaka
  17. disturbedbyjoy reblogged this from geekwingnet
  18. birdandthebell reblogged this from daivialesley
  19. geekwingnet reblogged this from vwvillgraham
  20. vwvillgraham reblogged this from nerdglassesanonymous
  21. theanimegirlaka reblogged this from stoicscripter
  22. stoicscripter reblogged this from projectcutie
  23. swiggityswrlthisismy1securl reblogged this from makingitanime
  24. makingitanime reblogged this from bagumbo
  25. twobit-the-great reblogged this from iwillincendiotheheartoutofyou
  26. projectcutie reblogged this from prussianpyjamas
  27. bagumbo reblogged this from whererthemuffins
  28. whererthemuffins reblogged this from nerdglassesanonymous
  29. thedoctorshairporn reblogged this from toeten
  30. xxayakoxx reblogged this from steam-powered-narwhal
  31. sparks15 reblogged this from prussianpyjamas
  32. crimson-11-delight reblogged this from thatsrightimmadork
  33. manaecl reblogged this from 01101111-01101111-01100100
  34. toeten reblogged this from 01101111-01101111-01100100